*

Creation The Movie - podcast

This text will be replaced by the flash music player.

Download: Creation The Movie - podcast Creation The Movie podcast (opens in a new window)
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)

Creation The Movie - PDF

Creation The Movie - PDF version Creation The Movie - PDF version (opens in a new window)PDF Document

Other FNT's you may be interested in

Trusting God in turbulent times 27 Jan 2012
To some the sea is a challenge to overcome. To others, a dangerous enemy.
Noble lives 7 Oct 2011
The Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to three scientists whose research shows the universe is expanding at an ever-increasing rate.
Critical Yeast 24 Jun 2011
“Sad to hear of Brian Haw’s death. While UK bombed Iraq a man shouting in Parliament Square was the nearest we came to sanity.”

Topic(s) for this FNT

Science | Atheism and Other Religions | Faith and Reason

Signup

Full Name:
Email Address:
Postcode:
How did you hear about FNT?:
 
 

Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.

Creation The Movie

25 September 2009

creation

Today sees the release in UK cinemas of Creation, marking the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth. Husband and wife Paul Bettany and Jennifer Connelly give beautifully nuanced performances as Charles and Emma Darwin experiencing a difficult period of life. Directed by Jon Amiel, it's a touching, unconventional biopic which looks at Darwin's ideas, tensions in his marriage and his crumbling faith.

Primarily set in 1858, the year before On the Origin of the Species was published, the film has many flashbacks revealing Darwin's struggles during the previous years. The key event was the death of his eldest daughter, Annie (Martha West). Charles was an unusually devoted father for his day, and Annie was his favourite child. He was with her, caring for her, while she died at the age of ten, far from home and the rest of the family. Her untimely death devastated him, and it made deeply personal what had been an intellectual struggle for years: the problem of suffering.

His careful observations of nature had confronted him with a brutal struggle for survival. It seemed utterly contrary to the agreeable world of William Paley's Natural Theology, which had once greatly impressed Darwin. As the years went by, he never lost his conviction that a creator was behind the existence of the universe, but he doubted that God had any further involvement in it. He described himself as an agnostic, but his agnosticism had a distinctively deist hue.

Creation has been hailed by some as a celebration of atheism. On the Guardian website this week, Ariane Sherine described it as, 'one of the most robust defences of atheism and agnosticism ever to appear in a mainstream film.' It really isn't. The one character who gives a strong atheist line is Thomas Huxley (Toby Jones), but he is portrayed as arrogant and bullying. He claims, like certain outspoken atheists today, that Darwin's ideas have killed God, and that science and religion are at war.

Darwin himself doesn't see it this way. Bettany portrays him as being distressed by this antagonism and anxious about the social consequences of undermining belief in God. Yes, we do see him lose faith in a personal, benevolent God, but it's too simplistic to see this as simply a consequence of his scientific ideas, as Nick Spencer makes clear, also on the Guardian website.

Emma Darwin is an important ingredient in the story. She was a committed, thoughtful Christian and Creation shows her real concern for her husband's spiritual well-being. Letters reveal, however, that it wasn't Charles's ideas which were the real issue, but the fact that he was too preoccupied with scientific proof: he couldn't engage with the possibility that God may also reveal truth in ways that are outside the scope of science. At the end of the film, Charles asks Emma to decide whether or not Origin should be published. It's a clever way of dramatising a discussion that must have taken place between them. Emma calls herself his 'accomplice' for agreeing to publication, but she would never have done so if she thought his ideas really undermine belief in God.

For Huxley, perhaps for Darwin, and for many atheists today, Darwin's ideas provide an alibi for scepticism about God. But the fact that there are Christians like Emma whose faith is not undermined by evolution shows that the alibi is far from watertight.

The relationship between science and faith is a hot topic in our society, and Creation raises some important questions as it tells the moving and significant story of one man's struggles. That's why Damaris was happy to produce a number of resources for churches on behalf of Icon Film Distribution. These are vital issues to discuss, and this film provides a fascinating opportunity to do so.

Tony Watkins, Damaris


Latest comments :
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)

Written by Jethro on 01 October 2009 at 16.53
David Young, you disappoint me. You just don't like the answer.

Now about the highest mountain. In 1809 it was believed to be Dhaulagiri, in 1840 Kanchanjunga and in 1986 K2. Everest was measured in 1852 at 29,002 ft. (I remember being told that the 2 ft were added because nobody would believe exactly 29,000) 1n 1955 it was 29,028 and in 1999 it was 29,035.

Now that's the nature of science. Nothing wrong with it. What is wrong is blind faith in it.
Written by David Young on 01 October 2009 at 05.53
Jethro, what was the highest mountain in the world before Everest was discovered?
Written by David Young on 30 September 2009 at 09.51
Andrew, now would be a good time to find out exactly why the complexity of DNA is explicable by means of natural selection. Evolution by natural selection is a fact repeatedly confirmed by the evidence time and time again. Tired old creationist arguments about gene complexity didn't work in the past and they don't work now.

There are 6 additional comments for this page.

Comments for this article are now closed


Subscribe to for those comments!


Subject: Science | Science and theology | Creation and evolution | Science and Christianity | Atheism
    Author: Watkins, Tony
    © Evangelical Alliance