*

God and the G20 - podcast

This text will be replaced by the flash music player.

Download: God and the G20 - podcast God and the G20 podcast (opens in a new window)
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)

God and the G20 - PDF

God and the G20 - PDF version God and the G20 - PDF version (opens in a new window)PDF Document

Other FNT's you may be interested in

David Cameron’s Christian country 22 Dec 2011
The birth of Jesus was a political event, through and through. Our celebration of Christmas should therefore be political also.
Christmas carols 16 Dec 2011
Charles Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol in the context of the reform of the English Poor Laws. The New Law concerned orphanages, workhouses and debtors’ prisons.
On Lobbying 9 Dec 2011
I often find myself denying it. Usually at social gatherings where I meet new people and I am asked: “So, what do you do?” I've developed a little patter that explains my job. I explain that I represent Christians to parliament and government, but the response is often the same: “You're basically a lobbyist then?”

Topic(s) for this FNT

Suffering and Poverty | Politics

Signup

Full Name:
Email Address:
Postcode:
How did you hear about FNT?:
 
 

Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.

God and the G20

26 March 2009

flags

"This isn't going to be another Stop the War moment, where a huge march is held, the government ignores it and everyone goes home depressed. And it's not going to be another Make Poverty History, where the rock stars meet the world leaders and everyone makes promises and nothing happens. This is a serious coalition with a serious agenda, and we're in it for the long term."  

So said Nick Dearden from the Jubilee Debt Campaign who was referring to this weekend's 'Put People First' march, which is taking place ahead of the G20 meeting next week in London. The coalition has a wide range of voices from trades unions, through environmental groups, to religious groups, including our own Micah Challenge. Its manifesto is that as the world's richest nations pay attention to the global economic crisis, they must not forget those who wield little political and economic power: the poorest, our children, those without jobs.  

The aims are laudable, and we can only hope and pray that the demonstrations pass off peacefully so that the goals are not undermined by the actions of a few. But the key in what Dearden said was his final comment, "We're in it for the long term". For if we're honest, many of us have been campaigning on issues of global economic justice for years, if not decades. Live Aid was over twenty years ago, and despite the promises of the more recent Millennium Development Goals, little has changed for the poorest in our midst - by which I mean the poorest on our planet.  

Going even further back, the international development industry has been beavering away since the 1950s and yet the plight of the average sub-saharan African has hardly changed. Why is it that despite such massive investment over time, the situation of the poorest is still so dire? It would be easy at this point to simply blame our international institutions, and no doubt they are part of the problem. The Structural Adjustment Programs of the 1980s are widely considered to have been a failure in alleviating actual poverty. But it is not as simple as just blaming wrong policies or lack of political will.  

The causes of poverty are complex and go way beyond our unjust economic system. One of the most interesting findings in the World Bank report 'Voices of the Poor' was the importance of religious faith to those who experience the most extreme poverty. The report interviewed over 60,000 men and women living in poverty and asked them how they defined poverty and well-being.  

What was remarkable - at least for secularists - was that despite the fact that these people were suffering from material, economic and socio-political deprivation, they frequently drew attention, not to those factors, but to their own need for spiritual wealth. Perhaps it is partly for this reason that religious organisations were the most trusted and respected by those who are actually poor, in contrast to those who claim to work on their behalf. The World Bank report states, "In ratings of effectiveness in both urban and in rural areas, religious organizations feature more prominently than any single type of state institution."  

Is it possible, then, that part of the reason why fifty plus years of 'development' on economic grounds has delivered so little is because the relevant politicians and international actors have failed to acknowledge one of the issues that the poor themselves say matters most to them: their spiritual needs? In saying this, I'm not suggesting that a few more evangelists will eliminate global poverty - but I am saying that a too narrow focus on economics alone is not the answer. You would have thought that our current economic crisis has shown that. So, as the coalition says, 'Put People First', and that includes their need for God.

Justin Thacker, Head of Theology

As Chair of the World Evangelical Alliance Theological Commission, Justin Thacker will shortly be leading a major piece of work exploring issues of development and theology, including the implicit theologies that different development agencies use. The aim is to work with these agencies to ensure that they ground their practices in sound theological principles and thereby continue to serve the poor in the most appropriate way possible. If you are interested in this work and/or wish to support it, please email Justin at j.thacker@eauk.org


Latest comments :
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)

Written by David Young on 02 April 2009 at 10.21
Jethro, I would consider 'ad hominem' to be associated with personal attacks. Saying that someone has probably never been a follower of a particular person is not an attack, just a statement of fact. If someone told me that I had never been one of Karl Marx's followers, I would hardly take offence at it, now would I?

Now on the other hand, 'People like you not believing in myths like mine inevitably leads to the genocide of Stalin'...
Written by Jethro on 01 April 2009 at 19.35
"....you probably never have been one."

Wow, that's harsh on JustinT, DavidY. The phrase 'ad hominem' comes to mind.
Written by David Young on 01 April 2009 at 12.27
Justin, you might like to read what that rabbi from Nazareth said about your imaginary God, or have you now stopped being one of Jesus' followers? Come to think of it, seeing as you haven't sold everything and given it to the poor (unless you made your last post from a drop-in centre), you probably never have been one.

There are 26 additional comments for this page.

Comments for this article are now closed


Subscribe to for those comments!