Kaka - podcast
Download: Kaka - podcast
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)
Kaka - PDF
Other FNT's you may be interested in
| ||||
Topic(s) for this FNT
Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.
Kaka
16 January 2009
What does conformity look like these days? If you happen to be a football superstar - and I've no doubt we've a few amongst the FNT readership - the answer to that question might seem fairly straightforward. As one football journalist put it this week, "People in England are used to their football stars being George Best, Gascoigne, maybe fast living, drinking. He's not in that category at all is he?" The person he is referring to is, of course, Kaka: devout evangelical Christian, 2007 Fifa World Player of the Year, and subject of more than a little coverage this week thanks to £100 million transfer negotiations with Manchester City . This is how Gabriele Marcotti, the respected Italian journalist, responded to the interviewer's question:
He's more from the Jonathan Edwards school of stardom, Kaka's an evangelical Christian, he's very committed to it, this is a guy who nearly broke his back before he became a teenager, he's a guy who's had to overcome a lot of personal trauma and he's spoken quite openly about it and he's found a lot of serenity and strength in God; and he's very committed to it. Everybody by now knows the story that he was celibate until his wedding night...he's got quite a different world outlook than a lot of other players and he'd certainly be different than many of the other stars in the premiership.
And Kaka himself has said this, "I'm a radical, I'm a radical for Christ." "In fact, I'm very radical. I have my life, I have my values. And compared to much of society, especially football, that is radical." Kaka doesn't just do the talk though; he lives his faith publicly. When Brazil won the 2002 World Cup, Kaka celebrated on the pitch by giving the glory to God and revealing a t-shirt which read, "I belong to Jesus." Given the industry in which he is involved, it is hard to deny that was a radical move.
Yet, having said that, it is inevitable that some will suggest that it is not that hard to be 'radical' when you're being offered a reported half a million a week. But this is precisely what makes him more than interesting. In the interview cited above, Marcotti suggests that from a footballing point of view a move to Manchester City makes little sense, that he knows that Kaka is not motivated purely by money, which leaves a desire to spread Christianity in secular Britain as one possible motivation. He says, "He [Kaka] believes in the example of the way he lives as a way of really living the religious message and being able to change people's lives…he really really believes this and he really believes he has a broader message to spread off the pitch as well, through his example, not by preaching, but through his example. He may find that this country [United Kingdom] might be a fertile place for him to spread his word."
It is hard to know whether that really will be what brings Kaka to the UK, but Kaka is consistent that his primary motivation in life has always been his faith and trust in God. If, then, it is his faith rather than money that brings him here, it would seem that he is living proof of what Jesus once said, that although it is hard for the rich to enter the kingdom of God, with God "nothing is impossible," (Luke 18: 27). And perhaps with Kaka, we are seeing God do just that - not just on the pitch, but more significantly, off it as well.
Justin Thacker, Head of Theology
FNT is now being promoted on You Tube. Click here and enjoy!
Latest comments
:
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)
| Written by Justin Smith on 22 January 2009 at 13.27 |
| Thanks Jethro for your two posts below. I do understand where you're coming from and this does seem to be the 'progressive' Christian response ? I guess I'd hear something similar from Rowan Williams. However, I can't see Christianity growing and prospering based on this non-responsive, non-interventionist God. Couldn't you just be having a conversation with yourself? And surely, if there wasn't a god out there listening, you'd never actually know about it. |
| Written by Jethro on 21 January 2009 at 12.09 |
| "So, either god exists but doesn't get involved, or he doesn't exist in the first place." Sorry to hog the conversation, JustinS, but can I just pick up this point. If by 'not getting involved' you mean 'not intervening', then I woud have to agree. But I have another way - the way of relationship. That is the heart of religion, and is not invalidated by apparent lack of intervention. And, if that is true, it does affect us. |
| Written by Jethro on 21 January 2009 at 10.52 |
| Hi JustinS, I've been called a few things, including 'apostate' (because I argued the Bible doesn't say what the traditionalists say it says on the gay issue), but never 'mystic'. I had to look it up. Of all the meanings, I guess 'confused and irrational speculation' might be the nearest. I'm fine with that. You asked, "why is it that so many Christians I talk to think this way though?" It must just be the people you talk to. My personal answer is that in a segment of Evangelicalism, people are taught things like 'prayer works'. So, if prayer doesn't work, the sky will fall down, which means they defend, not just the theory, but every instance tooth and nail. Same with the Bible. They have swallowed the notion that if it is incorrect in any respect, nomatter how trivial, it isn't reliable in any respect, so fear drives them to savage any apparent questioning of Scripture. To come back to prayer, it is self evident to me that, having prayed x, you can never unpray it, so you can never know what would have happened if you hadn't prayed x. It follows from that that you can never actually know that prayer worked. Now I, in my mystic confusion, am perfectly happy with this. My reading of the Bible (as distinct from happy-clappy choruses, like 'Prayer changes things') says that prayer is conversation with God. It tells me that I can trust God not to give me anything I pray for, which, if I had known all he knows about me and everyone else, I wouldn't (or shouldn't) have prayed for in the first place. The picture of someone who gets what they ask for, and especially what they pester is for me, a picture of a brat, not a saint, and the picture of a parent who responds is the picture of an absent parent, whether or not (s)he is there physically. So, for me, nothing about God rides on the outcome of my prayers. Like a child, I am confident that I can absolutely level with God, and (s)he will never sneer at me or turn me away. So I pray a lot. |
There are 15 additional comments for this page.
Comments for this article are now closed
EAUK.org






