*

Murray Fever - podcast

This text will be replaced by the flash music player.

Download: Murray Fever - podcast Murray Fever podcast (opens in a new window)
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)

Murray Fever - PDF

Murray Fever - PDF version Murray Fever - PDF version (opens in a new window)PDF Document

Other FNT's you may be interested in

The beautiful game 10 Feb 2012
As Capello moves out and the Redknapp looks set to move into the hot seat of English football, our national game has never been so vilified.
Isles of Wonder 3 Feb 2012
As the six-month countdown to the Olympic & Paralympic Games began, the artistic director Danny Boyle revealed the theme of the opening ceremony.
Sabbath 26 Aug 2011
"The person who instituted the 'joint cycle and bus lane' should be sacked; or, even better, thrown to the lions - just to experience first-hand the effect of this mad idea." These were my grumblings as I pumped air into my tyres. While the bike may be ready for the bank holiday, my mind clearly needs peace. May the bank holiday weekend be a good Sabbath for us all.

Topic(s) for this FNT

Sport

Signup

Full Name:
Email Address:
Postcode:
How did you hear about FNT?:
 
 

Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.

Murray Fever

3 July 2009

tennis

"I'll be supporting anyone but England."

"I think we both played like women in the first set."

Two quotations from the notoriously outspoken Andy Murray. And you would think that on the basis of them he would have alienated so many that his support would be restricted to just the male half of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Except, as we all know, that isn't what has happened.  

For whether or not he gets through to the final or indeed wins it, the fact remains that the vast majority of the UK populace will be supporting Murray this weekend and proud of what he's achieved. So why is this the case?

Well, partly it's because the quotations have been taken out of context - especially the first one. Andy is not as anti-English as that jibe would suggest. But it's also because he is a winner - and we love to be associated with winners.

In particular, he seems to be offering us the best chance of a Wimbledon victory for many, many years. And now that an incredibly talented Scot has stepped up to the plate, dismissing his opponents with far more confidence than Henman achieved, we flock to be identified with his glory. The point has frequently been made that if Andy wins, he's British, but if he loses, a Scot, but the reality is that he has already achieved so much that he is firmly embedded in the UK psyche as one of us - whatever else takes place.

Yet that word 'flock' is interesting isn't it? It's a reminder that sheep-like following is the prevailing tendency of us all. The interesting thing, then, about being an evangelical - particularly a card-carrying, unashamed evangelical - is that 'following the crowd' is hardly an accusation that can be levelled with any kind of plausibility. Whatever else we evangelicals are, we do not simply go wherever the mass of society might wander. We plough our own furrow.

At times, we don't do that enough. We fail to be as distinctive as we should be: our complicity with consumerism would be an example. At times, we are distinct, but ploughing perhaps the wrong furrow or in the wrong way: our tendency to dogmatism for instance. But despite those failings, we are undeniably different. We do not just fit in. We walk, albeit falteringly, the narrow path.

So next time you get challenged for your Christian beliefs, I guess a response to your friend might just be this: 'yes, what I believe is different;' 'yes, what I believe is at times at odds with the rest of society, but at least I am making a stand.' 'I am being counter-cultural.'

And ironically, while no doubt the vast majority of us will jump on the Murray bandwagon this weekend, the one person who may not is Murray himself. He will continue to be independent, at times outspoken, not capitulating entirely to the media machine, speaking his own mind, not merely a popularist. And perhaps in doing so, he is an example to us all.

Justin Thacker, Head of Theology


Latest comments :
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)

Written by David Young on 08 July 2009 at 16.31
A charge of 'following the crowd' can of course be levelled against Evangelicals. Every generation of your lot has its fads and trends, and once they are in place there are only ever a few among you who dare to say 'No, I'm not convinced by that'. The only defence you could legitimately put forward is that you're not as bad as the Charismatics (territorial spirits, inner healing, prayers of binding and loosing, being slain in the spirit, words of knowledge, glossolalia, 'That sounds a bit liberal', 'That sounds a bit New Age', 'I have a burden for...', and so on).
Written by Al on 03 July 2009 at 17.55
All of my life I have moved in 'evangelical' circles and have found, like Richard, that there is not a lot of room for those who, like myself, think 'outside the box'. It seems that the evangelical tribe has little time (publicly) for honest doubters or dissenters. As long as we 'toe the party line' we are accepted as 'sound believers.'
It may be, of course, that many more of our flock have doubts that we are afraid to admit in public! Maybe its time to stand up and be counted as to what we really believe, rather than what we 'ought' to believe?
Written by richard on 03 July 2009 at 17.14
I am afriad that I have been too busy to realise that the tennis is on much (except that my clients keep takling about it!). I tend to find that the hardest place to be differant at the moment is Church. My friends outside of Church seem to be inquisitive about how I live and why I do what I do. I like that. t doesent seem to pose a huge problem though, chats over a pint, or over lunch or in a drop -in about the nature of existence seem fun.
I am sure that like the article suggests, I get it wrong and am very much on a journey of working out what it is to try and follow Christ.
I find though that in the Church it can be very difficult to try and walk with Christ as the 'flock' does not sometimes give much room to explore, to be open about either questions, differing ways of living than the rest, differing use of language than is normal within any given stream of thought, differing interpretations of scripture than the flock is used to etc etc. But this is to be expected, valued even perhaps?
I am not an evangelical so in part it could just be that living with (a very very loving) primarily evangelical Church will always be hard. I have no doubts that if my community was Catholic or whatever this would be the same - I am sure that we all, me especialy, carry assumptions that we are not willing to question. But to walk with freedom as an individual whilst also called to give way to each other, to consider one another above oneself, to die to one another etc etc I find very hard. Maybe its just me, but the Church I love because it seems to both be a place of becoming free and becoming bound all at once?
hmm, im rambling.
Nice article

Comments for this article are now closed


Subscribe to for those comments!