Obama the Evangelical? - podcast
Download: Obama the Evangelical? - podcast
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)
Obama the Evangelical? - PDF
Other FNT's you may be interested in
| ||||
Topic(s) for this FNT
Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.
Obama the Evangelical?
29 February 2008
If you have been avidly following the US elections as I have, then you will be aware of the stories that have circulated suggesting that the leading Democrat candidate, Barack Obama, is in fact a Muslim. Earlier in the week, a photo was circulated, showing him dressed in a supposedly Islamic outfit (it was in fact Somali), and a number of broadcasters have repeatedly used his middle name, Hussein, to try and suggest he has Muslim tendencies.
In response, Obama has felt the need to reassert his Christianity. So, his faith and conversion story have appeared prominently in his stump speech, and he has given interviews to a range of Christian outlets. It can usually be assumed that US presidential candidates will subscribe to some form of religious faith, but the question that arises is what kind of Christianity does Obama hold to? In particular, could he be called an 'evangelical', or would he want to be?
In an interview with Christianity Today, Obama stated, "I am a Christian, and I am a devout Christian. I believe in the redemptive death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. I believe that that faith gives me a path to be cleansed of sin and have eternal life." Such statements certainly suggest that Obama has an orthodox Christian faith, but do they qualify him as an evangelical? When Obama was asked directly whether he considered himself to be an evangelical, his response was typically nuanced rather than an outright denial: "Gosh, I'm not sure if labels are helpful here because the definition of an evangelical is so loose and subject to so many different interpretations…Does it mean that you feel you've got a personal relationship with Christ the savior? Then that's directly part of the black church experience. Does it mean you're born-again in a classic sense, with all the accoutrements that go along with that, as it's understood by some other tradition? I'm not sure."
In saying this, Obama is simply reflecting the fact that in the US the term 'evangelical' means different things to different people. Having said that, Obama is also clear about the practical difference that his faith makes. "I believe in the example that Jesus set by feeding the hungry and healing the sick and always prioritizing the least of these over the powerful….Accepting Jesus Christ in my life has been a powerful guide for my conduct and my values and my ideals." Whether or not we would agree with all the conclusions Obama reaches as he applies his faith to his life, it seems certain that the man has an authentic relationship with Jesus. Of course, we could be cynical about all this, thinking that his protestations of faith are merely to win over the electorate. However, Rev. Jim Wallis, a leading US evangelical, writes "I have known Barack Obama for more than 10 years, and we have been talking about his Christian faith for a decade."
And whatever we think of him as a possible future President, we should always stand against lies that are spread about any candidate. So, despite the reports, Obama is not a Muslim. He is a follower of Jesus, and one that makes clear that faith must make a difference to life. Amen to that!
Justin Thacker, Head of Theology
Latest comments
:
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)
| Written by Jurgen on 03 March 2008 at 20.49 |
| The world currently has a US president who calls himself an evangelical and look at the results - the gap between rich and poor in America widening, black vistims of Huricane Katrina still not rehoused, a health system in meltdown and a quarter of the population with no health insurance, climate change denial, ripping up of numerous international treaties from Kyoto to refusing to recognise the International Criminal Court to undermining the Geneva Convention, supporting and practising state torture, kidnapping and detention without trial, the biggest arms budget in real terms since World War 2 and have I mentioned an illegal war in Iraq which has cost $6 TRILLION to date? And lest we forget, it was the evangelicals who voted him in and were regarded by some commentators to have made the difference in both the 2000 and 2004 elections. At least Obama had the guts to speak out against the Iraqi war even before it started. |
| Written by friarmik on 01 March 2008 at 16.42 |
| In the arena of nuanced replies, Obama does not stand alone. For example would the Alliance clearly support a faithful muslim being president of the USA? I am all for clarity but find that even neo-evangelicals like to box clever on issues. I guess the gay debate is the most obvious. However I assume that with the excellent appointment of Joel Edwards to the Human Rights Commission the Alliance is able to support long term gay relationships. I was in a 'Christian' meeting recently when a refreshing event took place. A palestinian Muslim stood and asked a question of Shane Claiborne of the Simple Way. It was simply summarized ad how much muslims love what the simple way is doing in living real and why is it that christians find it so hard to replicate this? There are great grounds for creative conversation between muslims and christians. Yes let be unequivocal in what we say, but lets make sure we have activities that reflect what we say. Let's ask ourselves why a presidential candidate who was a muslim would be bad news, and reflect less on candidates into the future but join Shane in reflecting on what would be the values informing the presidential office if Jesus were President. |
| Written by David Young on 29 February 2008 at 20.55 |
| Is it just me or does anyone else think that this is no more than a thinly veiled Party Political Broadcast? |
There are 2 additional comments for this page.
Comments for this article are now closed
EAUK.org






