EAUK.org
Share
Preach the Gospel at all times. If absolutely necessary, use carbon. - podcast
Download: Preach the Gospel at all times. If absolutely necessary, use carbon. - podcast 
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)
Preach the Gospel at all times. If absolutely necessary, use carbon. - PDF
Preach the Gospel at all times. If absolutely necessary, use carbon. - PDF version 
Other FNT's you may be interested in
| ||||
Topic(s) for this FNT
Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.
Preach the Gospel at all times. If absolutely necessary, use carbon.
8 February 2008
If you're an avid reader of the comments that are posted on our website each week you'll be aware that, according to one contributor, there are: 'Ten Top Subjects About Which Christianity Has No Contribution To Make'. Unfortunately, for some Christians, one of these subjects is combating climate change. These Christians take the view that because a day is coming when God will completely destroy this planet, there is no need for us to expend our energies in looking after it - we should simply get on with the business of what they call 'evangelism'.
I'm glad that most British evangelicals do not see things this way. Rather, in response to God's command to love our neighbour, there is a recognition that caring for our natural resources is precisely what we, as Christians, should be doing. This is especially the case because of the disproportionate impact of global warming on the poor. Given all this, Tearfund, the largest evangelical aid agency in the UK, launched their Carbon Fast campaign this week. The idea behind the campaign is that instead of giving up chocolate or television for Lent why not go on a carbon fast for the 40 days up to Easter? Tearfund make a range of practical suggestions on what this might mean: removing one light bulb, snubbing plastic bags, turning down your thermostat and so on.
Now, of course, many of these suggestions are what we should all be doing all the time and not just as an extra effort for the days of Lent. Tearfund are not suggesting that it is acceptable for us to go back to our previous habits after Lent. What they are hoping is that adopting these ideas for this period may lead us to make them ongoing lifestyle habits.
It would seem, then, that contrary to the views of some, Christians do at least have a contribution to make to combating climate change. Moreover, this is not a distraction from the gospel of Jesus Christ, but is precisely what proclaiming the good news of Jesus is all about. When Jesus left his disciples, the instruction he gave them, the so-called 'Great Commission', was not simply to persuade people to believe a different set of doctrines. Rather the instruction was to make disciples (i.e. followers) who 'obey everything I have commanded you' (Matthew 28:20). According to Jesus, these commands were summed up in this: love God, and love your neighbour.
In other words, proclaiming the good news of Jesus Christ has to include both teaching and demonstrating (for that is often the best way to teach) his command to love all. Hence, turning off a light bulb in the name of Jesus, far from being a distraction from the gospel, is rather an important part of the gospel of Jesus Christ, and may turn out to be the best 'evangelistic' strategy we have.*
* For further exploration on the interaction of 'social action' and 'evangelism' by Justin Thacker, see here.
Justin Thacker, Head of Theology
Latest comments
:
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)
| Written by Anon on 12 February 2008 at 14.13 |
| Hi Anon here, Good point Andrew however while it might be in my power (with God?s help) to feed myself, pay my Bills keep me healthy, it might not actually be in my power to reverse climate change? Quite apart from what Billions of my fellow human beings choose to do about their carbon footprint the jury is still out on whether the effects are indeed reversible. In fact some of the measures to tackle climate change will make it manifestly more difficult for us all to feed ourselves, to keep ourselves healthy or to pay our bills?.is that a likely choice for society to make? |
| Written by Andrew Buxton on 12 February 2008 at 14.02 |
| Maybe Anon spends all day in bed asking God to feed him, pay his bills, keep him healthy, etc? Surely it's in God's power? |
| Written by Tull on 11 February 2008 at 11.46 |
| Perfect timing Justin. This weekend, February 9th, I was outside in London in a t-shirt. Trees on my street have come into blossom. Something feels very wrong. The politicians are in an awful bind of having to prescribe some pretty rough medicine. It is up to the church to LEAD the way on this one because we follow a guy who modelled self-sacrifice, Self-sacrifice of one kind is going to be necessary if we are to get out of this mess, and pretty quickly at that. Imagine one million evangelicals taking a radical stand on this, an incarnational and prophetic movement to the rest of the nation. This is a movement the EA could lead. Will it...? |
There are 7 additional comments for this page.
Comments for this article are now closed
