Did you like this FNT?
Make a gift - help spread the word.

Donate Now!

Questioning Question Time - podcast

This text will be replaced by the flash music player.

Download: Questioning Question Time - podcast Questioning Question Time podcast (opens in a new window)
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)

Questioning Question Time - PDF

Questioning Question Time - PDF version Questioning Question Time - PDF version (opens in a new window)PDF Document

Other FNT's you may be interested in

Mr Wilberforce's Halo Slip 13 Aug 2010
The reputation of evangelicalism's greatest hero - William Wilberforce - took a dent last week.
Would You Ban the Burqa? 23 Jul 2010
Belgium, France and Syria have done it and so it seems to be the done thing now, to think about banning the burqa.
The New Testament and the New Government 11 Jun 2010
It’s crucial to reject the idea that the New Testament and politics are un-connected or even incompatible.

Topic(s) for this FNT

Politics | Atheism and Other Religions

Signup

Full Name:
Email Address:
Postcode:
How did you hear about FNT?:
 
 

Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.

Questioning Question Time

23 October 2009

question mark

In 1984, Jean-Marie Le Pen was given a slot on the French TV show L'Heure de Vérité (The Hour of Truth). At that time, his far right National Front party was in the electoral wilderness having won just 0.2% of the vote at the previous national election. In his appearance, Le Pen tried hard to remove the idea that he and his party were fascists and in the following election their share of the vote had jumped to 9.7%. According to the party, they got 30,000 new members and Le Pen later on described it as "the hour that changed everything".

The question, then, is whether a similar fate awaits Nick Griffin and the BNP following last night's Question Time. Certainly, Mr Griffin was trying to change the rhetoric that surrounds his party claiming that he had dragged them from the extremities to a more moderate place. And it is worth noting that despite all the papers today describing the Question Time audience as being universally against Griffin, the reality is that on two occasions last night he was in fact applauded by a small section of that audience.

On both of those occasions, it was for the same reason: he was attacking Islam. And this goes to the heart of his appeal to the British populace. He trades on the politics of fear. As Chris Huhne, one of the Question Time panellists put it in a comment piece in The Independent today, the BNP's tactic is to "find a scapegoat and blame a minority for all our ills. Mosley and the British Union of Fascists blamed the Jews in the Thirties. Enoch Powell blamed the blacks in the Sixties and Seventies, and now Nick Griffin is trying to peddle hatred and fear against the Muslim community."

The relevance of all this to those of us whose desire is to proclaim the pure gospel of Jesus Christ and not the odious message of racism is to ensure that we do not similarly trade on a politics of fear. Such fear can certainly manifest itself in a hatred of Islam, but it can also be seen in an inappropriate defense of "Christian Britain." Surely, one of the things we know about the gospel is that people become Christians, not nations. And perhaps if we spent more of our time talking about the attractiveness of Jesus Christ, and a little less in defending our rights or demonising certain sections of the community, maybe more of those people would in fact embrace His glorious gospel. 

 

Justin Thacker, Head of Theology


Latest comments :
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)

Written by Jethro on 30 October 2009 at 09.28
By the way, good FNT, Justin. Thank you.

Looking over David Young's comments in previous FNTs, demonising etc. seems more his territory than Justin's.
Written by Richard pickles on 29 October 2009 at 18.52
Hi Jethro,

the issue of the similarities between how the BNP view people of non 'white' races and some Christians views of homosexuals is an intriguing one. Both obviously want to deny any personal repulsion and want to couch it in other terms, rational terms that somehow just happen to involve exclusion (with occasional moral outpourings about deviancy etc). And of course we don't have to dig deep into Church history to see texts justifying all sorts of similar attitudes. It leaves me reflecting though on how we do our interpretive work in ways that are faithfull but do not allow us to read our seeming unbuilt desire to exclude into them?it's not for a second that I don't think exclusion is still vital within the Gospel and society. I've been working with some particularaly violent people this week - the lack of love towards others that violence shows of course needs challenging. It's rather the judging of people for who they are and how they express love towards one another on narrow readings of a few texts allowing for untold violence upon homosexuals over the centuries seems somewhat beyond the pale maybe?
Written by Jethro on 29 October 2009 at 16.52
The thing that most disturbed me was the verbal gang violence that was unleashed on Nick Griffin. If there was any risk of his gaining some sympathy, that might be the cause.

Jurgen was saddened that it took a Muslim Peer to distance 'true' Christianity from the BNP. Maybe a lot of normally vociferous 'true' Christians were keeping their heads down on Question Time because they actually share the BNP's attitude to homosexuals, Jews, Muslims and maybe even women.

There are 11 additional comments for this page.

Comments for this article are now closed


Subscribe to for those comments!


Subject: Politics | Theological perspective on Islam
    Author: Thacker, Justin
    © Evangelical Alliance