Did you like this FNT?
Make a gift - help spread the word.
Other FNT's you may be interested in
| ||||
Topic(s) for this FNT
Arts and Contemporary Culture | Faith and Reason | Miscellaneous
Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.
The God-man Jesus and the scoundrel Philip Pullman
1 April 2010
Philip Pullman seems to enjoy stirring up controversy. He annoyed many Christians with his best-selling anti-church, anti-God trilogy His Dark Materials. And it's evident that he was out to provoke when he made comments like, 'my books are about killing God,' and, 'I'm trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief.' He's admitted that the latter comment, at least, was intended to wind up the reporter. Often he insists that he's simply telling stories, not preaching an atheist message.
Still, it's hard to think that Pullman's new book, The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ, is merely telling a story. Even the title seems calculated to inflame Christians, and it's surely no accident that it's being published in Easter week. The story itself is a curious mixture of respectfully retelling some parts of the Gospel accounts while mangling others.
Pullman says he decided to write about Jesus after Rowan Williams asked why he's never done so. He went back to the Gospels and read them in different versions, and then re-read Paul where he was struck by many more references to 'Christ' than to 'Jesus'. Pullman claims that Paul wasn't interested in Jesus the man, only the divine Christ.
So he decided to rework the story of Jesus to focus on this perceived tension. In his version, Mary gives birth to twins: Jesus and Christ. In the wilderness Jesus is tempted not by the devil, but by his brother. Christ wants Jesus to build a powerful church which could spread throughout the world being a force for good. Jesus flatly rejects Christ's pragmatism; he is an idealist who preaches the imminent arrival of the kingdom of God.
Christ, however, is approached by a mysterious stranger who encourages him to see the spiritual 'truth' beyond the sometimes inconvenient historical events. Eventually, the stranger seduces Christ into betraying Jesus (who loses his faith) and then deceiving the disciples into thinking that Jesus has risen from the dead.
Pullman's point is that what we read in the Gospels is not what actually happened. The real historical Jesus has been smothered by inventions of the early church - in particular the incarnation and the resurrection. Pullman's Jesus is an extraordinary man, but he's nothing more than that. He does no miracles, makes no claims to divinity and remains irrevocably dead after his crucifixion.
This is a well-worn attack on the Gospels, though Pullman gives it a provocative new coat of paint. It's a great shame that he evidently has no idea of the very impressive evidence for the reliability of the gospels.
It's interesting to see how, despite Pullman's tinkering with the Gospel accounts, Jesus remains a profoundly compelling character. When he prays in Gethsemane and concludes that God is not there to hear him, it feels like a grating contrast with what we've seen of him earlier in the book.
It's also fascinating that Pullman seems unable to tell the story without occasionally bringing in some very mysterious goings on, which do appear to be miraculous or angelic, even though he tries to deny or redefine such things. It feels like there are times when he's had to struggle hard to come up with a different interpretation of the events.
Pullman's gospel fairy-tale is hardly a threat to a Christian's faith, but it could well be a stimulus which starts many people thinking. The fact that an atheist like Pullman is trying so hard to explain away the divinity of Jesus should drive people back to the Gospels, to see for themselves what the truth really is.
Tony Watkins
Tony Watkins is a writer and speaker on culture, and Managing Editor of Culturewatch.org. He has written a number of article on Philip Pullman as well as, Dark Matter: A Thinking Fan's Guide to Philip Pullman (Damaris, 2005).
If you found this review interesting and would like to continue to explore the issues raised by this book, read the review written by Phil Green (Public Theology Research Assistant at the Evangelical Alliance).
Philip Pullman's The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ was published by Canongate on 31 March 2010
Latest comments
:
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)
| Written by Lelia West-Sinclair on 01 April 2010 at 22.40 |
| Hello, I suggest we pray for Pullman. He's obviously searching for the truth. Anyone who needs this much attention from a group of people may feel completely left out by them. And since he is an athiest, God may be nudging him to poke Christians into ways to pray for people who are alienated. I pray Jesus brings Mr. Pullman to himself, so that such an obviously talented writer can be used in his service. It wouldn't be the first time someone who oppressed or offended Christians was used by God to build his kingdom. |
| Written by Richard Pickles on 01 April 2010 at 16.02 |
| Hi, Thanks for writing this. I havent read the book yet, though I will do hopefully; I like his style generally. I am not convinced though that Philip wouldnt be aware of the arguments for the reliability of scripture; and the term 'reliability of scripture' seems to beg questions? theologians of all stripes seem to come up with a never ending array of ways of understanding to what extent scripture relates to 'reality'. Philip seems to be an educated and thoughtful man? Perhaps rather he doesent find the arguments put forth by whomever to be quite as 'impressive' as you do? Personaly I do find that the scriptures help me relate to the Jesus that many of the historical creeds have testified too, but I am not convinced that if I didnt already believe I would find the evidence for the fairly traditional story that Christians have told (it of course shifts through the years depending on how we define Christian, so please forgive the shorthand) of Jesus to be overwhelming? But that may just be me! Thanks for writing this, it made me reflect on how much wieght I put on the arguments Christians like to put on how reliable scripture may be. Richard Pickles |
| Written by Peter Waring on 01 April 2010 at 15.44 |
| I have only one question. Is Philip Pullman trying to see how silly he can be? |
Comments for this article are now closed
Subject: Books
Author: Green, Phil
© Evangelical Alliance
EAUK.org
RSS Feeds



