What should evangelicals believe and do? - podcast
Download: What should evangelicals believe and do? - podcast
(Note: Right-Click / Save Target As...)
What should evangelicals believe and do? - PDF
Other FNT's you may be interested in
| ||||
Topic(s) for this FNT
Data Protection Act 1998: By providing your personal details you agree to allow the Evangelical Alliance to contact you by mail, email, telephone or SMS text message in connection with its charitable purposes. The Evangelical Alliance does not make personal data available to external individuals or organisations.
What should evangelicals believe and do?
12 December 2008
This week, the Guardian website has been asking the question: What should evangelicals believe and do?Justin Thacker, Head of Theology at the Alliance, was commissioned to write a piece in response to the question. It can be viewed on the Guardian's website here and is reproduced below.
At the Evangelical Alliance, we often hear from those outside the evangelical Christian community with strong - if not always accurate - opinions on who we are. The monolithic impression people sometimes have of us as right-wing fundamentalists does not reflect the vast diversity of opinions we hear from within our two million strong community. British evangelicals encompass a wide variety of political views, but there is one characteristic you can count on when trying to spot one - a commitment to the Bible.
This commitment is one of the four fundamental markers identified by David Bebbington, Professor of History at Stirling University, in his monumental history of British evangelicalism. The others are a focus on Jesus' death on the cross, an emphasis on personal conversion, and an activist spirit. Given that we are defined by this reverent respect for the Bible, it seems fairly sensible to actually draw on the biblical text in order to answer the question: What should evangelicals believe?
I will do this by focussing on what has come to be known as Jesus' 'Sermon on the Mount', recorded in the gospel of Matthew, chapters five through seven. This seems particularly pertinent not just because in it Jesus sets out to some extent a manifesto for his followers, but also because it has driven the four criteria that Bebbington comes to identify. Jesus begins with the so-called 'beatitudes', a series of statements that challenge some of the received wisdom of his day. For instance, according to Jesus, it is the meek, not the strong or mighty, that will inherit the earth. He goes on to indicate that the task of believers is to change the world around them though, interestingly, he does not highlight at this point our preaching but rather our 'good deeds' as that which will lead to those around us giving praise to God.
Perhaps with that sentiment in mind, Jesus goes on to deepen his hearers understanding of the purpose of the Old Testament law. In his repeated refrain, 'you have heard that it was said, but I say to you', Jesus encourages his followers to view obedience not merely in terms of outward conformity, but much more importantly in terms of a renewed heart and spirit within. So, adultery is not merely a matter of the physical act, but also a state of mind. In saying this, Jesus is clear he is not as such negating the Old Testament law, but he is encouraging his readers to read it more deeply. Hence, Jesus can say that the Old Testament command to love your neighbour now applies equally to loving your enemies, which given that Palestine was under Roman occupation at the time is the equivalent of telling the residents of Mosul to love the US marines. And in its recent 'Don't be a Stranger' campaign, the Evangelical Alliance has sought to build on this teaching to encourage a more loving response to migrants within our communities.
Jesus continues by addressing a range of religious behaviours - prayer, fasting and giving to the needy. He enjoins his followers to avoid judgementalism, to discern the right path and right teaching, and to act with integrity. But then he concludes with the well known story of the wise and foolish builders. The point of the story is not so much that we must build our lives upon his teaching, but that our lives must be built on our obedient response to his teaching. So, he says, "Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock."
It strikes me, then, that if evangelicals are going to claim to be followers of Jesus Christ - which is what we do claim - then perhaps the question we need to be asking is not just 'What should evangelicals believe?' but perhaps more importantly 'How should we behave?' In, The Way of All Flesh, Samuel Butler, the 19th Century novelist, famously wrote in regard to a congregation that valued the status quo of formal religion that, "they would have been equally horrified at hearing the Christian religion doubted, and at seeing it practiced." Sadly, I sometimes wonder if the same could be said of evangelical Christians. For in his ethic of outrageous love, championing of the poor and freedom from hypocrisy, Jesus' words continue to test evangelicalism at its heart - and I say this as one who sits at the centre of the British movement. The fact is, we may believe his words, but obedience to them remains a distinct challenge for each one of us.
Justin Thacker, Head of Theology
Latest comments
:
(The views below are the authors', and not necessarily those of the Evangelical Alliance.)
| Written by David Young on 19 December 2008 at 10.07 |
| Richard Pickles, your response is the most common type I have encountered from people who claim 'Christ' is how they interpret the Bible, namely to write/talk at some length on a different topic altogether from the one in the question. Have you sold all your possessions yet? If not, how does 'Christ' fit in? |
| Written by Justin Smith on 18 December 2008 at 18.44 |
| Thanks Jethro. I'm with you part of the way, but I guess where we part company is the need for redemption by a supernatural deity. I suppose if you choose to live by the better parts of the old and new testaments then that's fine from a philosophical point of view - you could choose any literary tradition and pick the bits that work for you. I do however get a bit hung up on the truth claims of Christianity, for example Adam and Eve as a truth claim, Christ's rising from the cross (and possibly even his existence) as literal truth. It seems to me that there's too much metaphor, allegory and wishful thinking for anyone to seriously base one's life on it. |
| Written by Richard Pickles on 18 December 2008 at 14.53 |
| Hi David, Thankyou so much for responding. I guess that in every situation I have to ask, 'what I need to understand is....', and then realise that I could only ever grasp a fraction of both the context and the interactions between the various contextual issues and the phenemological movement within that (and indeed that the context creates to an extent). As I sit before a client I would seek to hold in mind Freud, Klein, Kohut etc etc and various ways of understanding personality development (all of whom contradict each other quite a bit) and the reality that I am only ever scratching at the edges of what it is to be that person and that I will always be bring huge chunks of my own stuff that I can never get away from or interpret without involving. I am not looking for a stable meaning but rather something that seeks to interpret the meaning of the other as best as I can. To read a text I would guess the same is true. I cant get into the orriginal context alot (but to be fair I do try!), or the mind of the authors/editors, the various unconcious processess I have about how I read or the various traditions that have informed me and the way I read. That is life! For me so far I find that ongoing searching of my own pressupositions, the grappling and arguing with the text and the early Church (the writers etc) fundemental to my journey of faith. Personally I find that an attitude of faith seeking understanding along with reading partners such as Derrida, Lacan and Ricouer who stop me from becoming too complacent has so far led to me finding and forming meaning that overwhelms me to my core. It sounds like this is not the case for yourself though? I would be interested to hear more? Richard Pickles |
There are 20 additional comments for this page.
Comments for this article are now closed
EAUK.org






